]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] HYPERTENSION [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
(10/31/1989)
From the newsletter of Thomas A.Dorman, M.D.,
(Freeman 93401DORM)
58 million Americans have hypertension. Is one in four of us
diseased? Officially, yes. The concept of disease separating the sick
from the healthy can be traced to ancient times when evil spirits were
let out of the body to restore health. In the late Renaissance, when
modern medicine crystallized, the hypothesis or model of disease as a
distinct entity was the lattice work upon which the major advances in
medical sciences occurred and which have contributed so marvelously to
modern well-being. The microbial cause of infectious disease developed
by Pasteur is the most distinct example. Other mental lattice works
for considering health and disease have been thought of at different
times. The notion of ill health occurring in some of us from an
idiosyncrasy to the environment, from an allergy to environmental
agents and to toxic substances, is such an example. The harmful effect
might be subtle; the discipline of allergy has only recently emerged
from a century long shadow and homeopathy is still taboo. The disease
concept has been a great boon P a useful hypothesis. It is possible
however that nature is running out of secrets which yield to this
model; perhaps we have harvested most of the diseases and syndromes.
It is true that some new diseases are being discovered, Legionnaire's
disease (on the 200th anniversary of the American revolution) Lyme
disease and AIDS, but their number is a mere trickle compared with
former times.
Cheating Nature
The disease concept implies that in the absence of disease
there is health. Nonetheless, aging, degeneration and death overtake
us all. Improving the well-being of a person, postponing the symptoms
of aging and deferring death can be thought of in the category of
cheating nature. Here the disease model doesn't serve very well.
Hypertension tends to affect most of us with advancing age and
certain sections of the public are at increased risk, black people,
diabetics and those with kidney disease. It is well established that
by lowering the blood pressure artificially, life is prolonged and
degenerative processes in the brain, the heart, the kidneys and other
organs are delayed. As one cannot sense one's own blood pressure
subjectively it is obviously sensible to record it with an instrument,
a sphygmomanometer, and take action if there is an elevation. This is
where preventative medicine enters the picture. Your doctor prefers
the term disease deferment or cheating nature. They define the mind-
set for this category of bodily change. In a previous newsletter we
have dealt with the problem of thinning bones in elderly women and
cheating nature with hormones. If you are philosophically attuned to
this approach, you may wish to maintain a low blood pressure and
prolong your life. However, for this discussion, lets get away from
the notion that low pressure is natural and hypertension is a disease
and abnormal. When interfering with the spontaneous changes in our
bodies there is a trade off. We might prolong and savour more of the
good life, but: 1) There is a price paid in dollars, the cost of
medication, doctor visits and laboratory studies. 2) Side effects of
the medication might be expected. 3) A longer life will increase your
expenses due to living into an older age. It is perfectly true that
hypertension affects some individuals during their working career, and
from an actuarial point of view, treating them increases the gross
national product, but most hypertensive patients are retired. An
increase in life expectancy here is a boon to the individual but an
expense to someone.
New Zealand Leads the Way.
The population of several civilized countries has adopted the
approach that good health is public property. A typical example we
have narrowly avoided in California is in laws which mandate crash
helmets for cyclists. When motor cyclists are injured, the expense is
charged to the public purse. The inevitable logic is that if the care
of the elderly is a public expense, then the public purse will be
drained least by early death.
About 15 years ago the Ontario government introduced their
form of national health with the slogan: Rprevention is better than
cureS. At that time your doctor was in charge of the internal medicine
services for a community in Ontario. The health minister graced our
town with an image-building visitation and his healthful policies were
discussed over a mediocre meal. I put it to him that the cost of
hypertension clinics was unknown, but clearly very large, because
every postponed stroke would increase pension costs and the patient,
still being a member of a mortal species, would have a terminal
illness at an older age. As the government was taking on the cost of
sickness, by adding a number of years to the person's life they were,
on the average, taking on the cost of the preventive care in addition
to the inevitable cost of the degenerative and terminal illness. The
minister was shocked at what he called my callous approach, but
admitted that no one in his government had even considered the matter.
It was good policy for electoral purposes to promote public health and
bring in national health on that basis. Soon after this encounter, but
for other reasons I left Canada. You can imagine that I am not
surprised to hear they now have long waiting lists for surgery, etc.
In socialized medicine New Zealand takes the cake. It has the oldest
socialized medical regime. This year New Zealand spawned two seemingly
unashamed articles actually advocating the withholding of treatment
for hypertension in __mild__ cases because of the cost. So rationing has
arrived and you have no choice.
Planning
It is not part of our cultural heritage to plan the end of our
lives. No one knows the date of his demise, but as your life insurance
premium is decreased, if your blood pressure is low, so should your
pension premiums increase, you expect to live longer. Your doctor
holds the opinion that in this category of health intervention, here
labeled cheating nature, the "purchasing decision" should be that of
the customer. The government's actuary is apt to have a slightly
different perspective.
Definition of Hypertension
The blood flows in our arteries in tides or squirts. The
hydraulic term is "pulsatile flow." This results from intermittent
muscle contraction of the heart. Immediately after the contraction
there is a peak pressure, the systolic pressure. While the heart
muscle is resting there is a trough or diastolic pressure. Within
certain limits, the lower the pressure, the healthier. For practical
purposes, a systolic pressure of 140 mmHg and a diastolic of 90 have
been defined as the demarcation point between normal and abnormal.
Arteries vary as do individuals, and your personal physician would be
wise to check the effect of hypertension on your body in order to form
an impression how normal the usual standard is for you.
How Does Hypertension Harm Us?
The amount of blood flowing to the organs is regulated
automatically by a number of feedback control servo-mechanisms. Some
of these are controlled through the nerves and some through hormones.
When the interaction between these is strained in some way, the blood
pressure may rise. Little arteries, arterioles, restrict the outflow
of blood from the pressure reservoir and the heart works harder. The
actual volume of flow is increased, normal or decreased. It is natural
for the blood pressure to rise as the emotions rise and when we
exercise. The harmful effect of hypertension is by making the arteries
tense for long periods which makes their walls thicken, sometimes
permanently. Although it is true that when the blood pressure is
extremely high, one of the pipes may rupture, bursting is not the
usual way harm comes about. It is better to imagine the silting up of
a drain as an analogy.
How To Control the pressure.
Lip service is paid to holistic means P biofeedback, stopping
smoking, using less alcohol, being thin, living without stress, and
exercising regularly. We pay homage to this list and perhaps follow it
a little. However, the control of hypertension with medicines is the
most effective way and what you come to the doctor for.
The Medicines.
Since the 1950's we have had effective medicines for
controlling blood pressure. The increase in effectiveness and the
decrease in side effects are gratifying. Most loops of the several
servo-mechanisms controlling blood pressure have been the subject of
pharmacologic attack. It has been found that, except in mild cases of
hypertension, the combination of several medications each working on a
different portion of the vascular regulatory mechanism gives the best
effect with least side effects. The price in dollars is another
matter.
Recommendation
You should have your blood pressure checked at every visit to
the doctor. If it is elevated on more than one occasion, you should
start recording it yourself. It is better and cheaper to acquire a
blood pressure cuff and keep a record yourself. Most importantly, it
is your problem and you will need to make a decision whether you want
the trade-off a longer life for the bother of cheating nature.
Doctor's Role
Your physician believes that after looking for and ruling out
secondary hypertension (that is to say, separate distinct diseases
which may be responsible for the hypertension, and these are quite
rare) you should start to take medicine which will control your blood
pressure. The introductory period usually calls for frequent doctor
visits. During this time you should be trained in regulating your
pressure yourself, keeping a record and even modifying the medication
within agreed ranges. As soon as you are stable, doctor visits become
infrequent and are mostly to check that your heart and arteries remain
healthy at the blood pressure levels you are holding.
The Shopping List of Medicines
There is a logic tree your doctor follows in choosing the best
medicine for you. Considerations include any other illnesses you may
have or which have affected your family. Not every hypertensive is
managed with the same drugs. In any case, the trial and success
process (I don't like the term "trial and error") will accommodate
your individual tolerance and susceptibility to the best buy for your
particular case.
Failures
There are no failures in the control of hypertension in modern
practice except when the patient doesn't follow through. It must be
admitted, however, that the amount of trouble in regulating people can
vary quite significantly.
Getting Rid of Hypertension.
Once it has arrived, the tendency to hypertension usually
lasts for life. On the other hand doctors have found that after good
control for a year or more, the body resets the "barometer" and less
medicine my be sufficient.
Many of us develop hypertension in old age. It is a matter of
individual interest and individual responsibility to control
hypertension. Your doctor's role is only to guide you. If there is a
decision to cheat the reaper of an early death, surely it should be an
individual decision?! Or is it a matter of public health?
* * *
Return to the ground floor of this tower
Return to the Main Courtyard
Return to Fort Freedom's home page