]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] BACK TO SILVER AND GOLD [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
The New York Times, Oct. 4, 1989 (10/5/1989)
[Kindly uploaded by Freeman 07656GAED]
To the Editor:
"How Much to Fence in the Fed" (editorial, Sept. 9) raises a ques-
tion that would never have arisen had our Government not violated
the monetary provisions of the Constitution.
Two centuries ago, the Founding Fathers of this country provided a
set of precisely defined,tightly integrated constitutional restraints
on the monetary powers of government. The specific purpose was to in-
sure that the United States dollar be commodity based, effectively
insulating the money supply from political manipulation.
Instead, in defiance of the Constitution (specifically Article I,
Section 8,concerning the power to coin money and regulate its value),
Congress created in 1913 the Federal Reserve system, a corporative
state banking cartel. Without constitutional authority Congress de-
clared Federal Reserve notes legal tender for all debt (1933), out-
lawed the redemption of those notes (or any government obligations)
in gold coin (1933), seized the American people's supply of gold
(1933), "demonetized" gold (1934) and at last outlawed the redemption
of Federal Reserve notes and paper currencies of the national Govern-
ment in silver (1968)--thus substituting the fiat paper currency of a
private banking consortium, and the Government's own base-metallic
token coinage, for the constitutional regime of gold and silver.
Once our Government again recognizes our Constitution as the sup-
preme law of the land, rather than fencing in the Federal Reserve, it
will be obligated to abolish the Fed and restore a silver and gold-
based constitutional money. WILLIAM VANDERSTEEL
Alpine, N.J.,Sept.11,1989
[Note from 07656GAED: An argument can be made that government should
not be in the money business at all--that banks should only be pri-
vate commodity warehouses which issue receipts (banknotes) to deposi-
tors. But practically speaking, we are a long way from such a utopia
and Mr. Vandersteel's proposal would be an excellent first step. Cen-
tral banking has impoverished most of the world. It and protectionism
caused the Great Depression and helped put Nazism in power in Ger-
many. And things could get much worse because of fiat money's insid-
ious economic and social consequences. Of course, there are deeper
philosophical causes to be cognizant of about what's wrong with the
world.]
[Note by Sysop: the author, William Vandersteel, is also an AtE sub-
scriber of long standing.]
* * *
Return to the ground floor of this tower
Return to the Main Courtyard
Return to Fort Freedom's home page