]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] NO SHOREHAM TAX WRITE-OFF! [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
6/9/88
Dear Dr B.:
[Referring to Rep. Lent's article on Shoreham, see :]
This is it. The anti-nukes have hit their high-water mark. The
irrationality and insanity of closing Shoreham is going to blow up in
their faces. I'm writing all my Congressmen et al. demanding the IRS
not permit a tax write-off of a perfectly good plant and wait until
the folks on Long Island find out first hand what it is not to have
enough energy and to pay through the nose for what they do get. I hope
you urge your readers to do what I'm doing so we can engage national
protest against the write-off.
B.G., Park Ridge, N.J.
P.S. Is Mr. Lent a subscriber?
Dear Mr B.G.:
I do so urge readers!
And space permitting, I hope to devote the August 88 editorial to
the point. This is not simply a matter of finances, but above all one
of self-responsibility.
It is, of course, unfair that the cost will not punish the real
perpetrators of this insanity, Cuomo, Nadir, Brokaw, and the other
politicians, social engineers and media moguls. And it is unfair to
punish the many Long Islanders who opposed the deal and supported
Shoreham.
But the alternative is vastly more unfair: that the cost of this
insanity inflicted by the politicians of Suffolk County and New York
State should be paid by the people of Wyoming (for example), and not
by the people who were duped into electing them.
As for Mr. Lent, he is not a subscriber. If he were, he would
know that kilowatts are units of power, not energy (kilowatt-HOUR);
but more important, he would know that in the non-financial aspect he
discusses, it is not the curtailing of acid rain, but the risk reduc-
tion of a catastrophe via the oil farms on Long Island that make
nuclear power preferable.
Cordially,
P.B.
* * *
Return to the ground floor of this tower
Return to the Main Courtyard
Return to Fort Freedom's home page